April 03, 2006

Gucci dreams in a poor land




NEW DELHI, India (AP) -- Its sleek contours are ringed by etched filigree. Its design was inspired by the architecture of ancient Greece. Handmade in Italy, it is available in only a handful of high-end boutiques and costs more than many Indians earn in a year.


It's a ball point pen.

Or it is unless you happen to be the guy selling it.

"What we are using here is not a pen. It is a jewel ... a masterpiece," said Juzar Zaveri, the sales manager overseeing the Indian launch of OMAS pens. Then he paused, struggling to find the right level of hyperbole: "It is a jewel of a masterpiece!"

In a country long known for its poverty, a tiny pocket of immense wealth is growing, lifted by a booming economy and lusting for brand-name luxury goods. For this subclass, consumption is nothing if it's not conspicuous.

So the sellers are coming, many in just the past few months: Louis Vuitton, Dior, Chanel and Bulgari have all opened boutiques. You can now buy a Rolls-Royce Phantom for about $790,000 or a Porsche 911 Cabriolet for $170,000.

There are magazines telling the rich how to spend their money (colon cleansing at an elite Bombay clinic, one glossy recently suggested) and news conferences to unveil new designer wear ("The color nude is all you need to know this season," Dior representative Kalyani Chawla told reporters). There's even help for the staff, with Rolls-Royce reportedly flying a representative to India to help train chauffeurs.

More than 40 percent of India, a country of more than a billion people, live on less than $1 a day, many without electricity or running water. But this country also has an economy growing at nearly 8 percent, fed by its importance as an international center for outsourcing and high technology. As import restrictions have loosened in the past couple of years, the trickle of foreign luxury goods has become a torrent -- aimed directly at the appetites of the new spending class.

"Now it's not Mahatma Gandhi who is important, it's Coco Chanel," said Suhel Seth, one of India's best-known marketing executives.

"Today we have multiplexes, we have malls, we have restaurants," said Seth, who navigates the country's clogged streets in a Porsche Boxster. "In all these places you want to be seen wearing the right badge ... and that badge is the Dior, the Chanel, the Louis Vuitton."

Times, very clearly, have changed.

When India achieved independence from Britain in 1947, everyone was expected to pay public fealty to the example of Mohandas Gandhi, the "Mahatma" or "Great Soul," who made his own clothes, ate only sparingly and always traveled third-class. For a time, homespun cloth was a gesture of ostentatious denial in wealthy Indian circles. Even India's royalty -- the network of maharajas and nawabs who became famous for their profligacy during colonial rule -- had to tone things down.

Tikka Shatrujit Singh remembers those days with a shudder.

"We had to hide our Rolls-Royces and drive around in half-moth-eaten vehicles," said Singh, a society fixture whose father was the maharaja of Kapurthala, a former north Indian princely state. His grandmother, he said, was particularly enamored of Gandhi's example, and made sure the rest of the family complied. "You sort of were ashamed of being wealthy," said Singh, who is now an adviser to Louis Vuitton.

In those days, class was most often determined by education or job status, and star university graduates became government officials, writers and professors.

With the new money, though, comes a redefinition of class.

Those jobs still have prestige, but it's the investment bankers, real estate developers and software magnates who can navigate the world of $450 OMAS pens and $1,000 Dior purses.

And the truly rich remain a very small crowd -- about one-thirtieth of one percent of the population, according to India's National Council of Applied Economic Research. That's about 50,000 households with annual incomes above $225,000.

While still a minuscule percentage, however, it's more than twice as many as five years ago, and the number is expected to double again by 2010.

The nouveaux riches are a reflection of an economy that has changed dramatically since socialism was abandoned for economic liberalization in the early 1990s.

Some made fortunes in real estate, others in the stock market. Some have moved home after years spent working in the United States or Britain. Top business school graduates now receive pay packages that rival salaries in New York or London.

But to some Indians, these people reflect a skewed vision of a country struggling with profound social problems, where the rise of the rich has simply widened the already vast gap between the wealthy and the poor.

"A hyper-inequality is being imposed on already high levels of inequality," said P. Sainath, a journalist who has spent much of his career writing about rural poverty.

High-tech cities like Bangalore, filled with free-spending young people and crowded bars, have become the new cliche of India, but much of the country remains cut off from modernity.

According to government statistics, barely half of rural Indian homes have electric lights and only four percent have refrigerators. Hundreds of debt-burdened farmers have committed suicide in south India over the past four years, crippling water shortages are increasingly widespread and the schooling system barely functions in some states. In the years from 1994-2004 -- the time when the economic reforms were taking hold -- rural unemployment nearly doubled.

"There are these huge brand names at one end of the spectrum, and at the other end there is serious deprivation -- whether it's in health or sanitation or education," said Sainath.

For the spenders, though, that's beside the point.

"It's a question of choice," said Singh, the royal man-about-town. "Why should Indians be denied access to the best?"

Opportunity calls in booming Bangalore



BANGALORE, India (AP) -- After graduating from Northwestern University last year, Nate Linkon contemplated job offers in Chicago and New York. But he chose a less conventional path and started his career here, in India's booming tech capital.

The 22-year-old Milwaukee native works in marketing at Infosys Technologies Ltd., India's second-largest software exporter. He's part of a small but growing number of young Americans moving to Bangalore and other Indian cities to beef up their resumes, launch businesses or study globalization in one of the world's fastest-growing economies.

Despite the traffic-choked streets, unsteady electrical supply, occasional digestive troubles and other daily frustrations of life in India, Linkon has no regrets.

"Moving to Bangalore has been the best decision of my life," Linkon said. "Asia will only become more significant to the global economy, and having this background is invaluable."

Nearly 800 Americans are working or interning at information technology companies in India, and the number is expected to grow, according to India's National Association of Software and Services Companies, or Nasscom.

India's economy has averaged 8 percent growth over the past three years, driven by the rapid expansion of its software, IT and business-process outsourcing industries. U.S. President George W. Bush's recent visit to India underscores the strengthening economic and political ties between the two countries.

India's economy still trails China's in size and growth rate. But unlike China, English is widely spoken in India, making its culture and career opportunities more accessible to foreign workers.

Like the young Americans who flocked to Eastern European cities like Prague and Budapest after the fall of communism, some college and business school grads are now heading to the world's second most populous nation to be part of its historic economic expansion.

"I didn't want a typical job right after college," said Peter Norlander, 22, who took a job in Infosys' human resources department after graduating from Cornell University last year. "Big things are happening here. I've got a front seat."

Bangalore is at the heart of India's bid to become a 21st century economic powerhouse. A sprawling southern metropolis of more than 6 million, it is known as India's Silicon Valley and is seeing breakneck growth, with an explosion of new office towers, technology parks, condo complexes and shopping malls.

With its numerous call centers and software firms serving foreign clients, Bangalore is also at the center of the global outsourcing debate, generating complaints from American workers worried about their jobs being shipped overseas.

Companies like IBM Corp., Dell Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Oracle Corp. have large offices here and are expanding their Bangalore work forces to tap into India's huge pool of well-trained, relatively inexpensive engineers and other professionals.

Older American expatriates have been coming to India for years to manage subsidiaries or train Indian employees. But now younger Americans are coming to take jobs at India's leading private firms or multinationals expanding their India operations.

"Indian corporates also gain from such professionals working with them, gaining knowledge of the cross-cultural nuances of managing a global work force," said Nasscom's Deepakshi Jha.

With its manicured lawns, food courts, gyms and cutting-edge architecture, the Infosys campus in Bangalore is an oasis of modernity in a city where the streets are jammed with buses, motorbikes, rickshaws, horse-drawn carts and herds of cows and goats.

Once they step off their corporate campuses, however, Americans must contend with the hassles of daily life in India, from haggling with rickshaw drivers to confronting scenes of grinding poverty.

"It's emotionally exhausting," said John S. Anderson, 29, a Stanford business school student who returned from India last summer after a year in Bombay helping eBay Inc. integrate employees at a newly acquired Indian firm.

"The poverty that you see at such an in-your-face level, and so much of it, gets really tiring," Anderson said. "You get up and drive to work in the morning, and every day four little girls come up to you and beg for money."

Another complaint is the seemingly endless workday here. Because of the time difference, employees often must work late at night or early in the morning to talk with colleagues or customers in the United States and Europe.

Still, Anderson and others say the chance to live, work and travel in such a dynamic society outweighed the troubles.

"All I knew about outsourcing in India was call centers," Anderson said. "What you find out when you go there is that there are just a ton of brilliant people with a strong entrepreneurial spirit."

Americans generally accept lower salaries to work in India, but their money goes a lot further, allowing them to dine at high-end restaurants, dance at the trendiest clubs and travel extensively within the country.

American software engineer Anna Libkhen, 31, took a big pay cut -- she now earns about one-fourth her salary in New York City -- when she transferred to Bangalore for Thomas Financial in October 2004.

But the chance to immerse herself in Indian culture is priceless.

"India as a country has a lot to offer: yoga, ayurveda (herbal medicine), meditation, food, dance, music," Libkhen said. "These are all the cultural aspects of life I was looking for."

Infosys, which has about 50,000 employees worldwide, aggressively recruits foreign employees and interns, hoping its international work force will help it better compete in the global marketplace. Each year, more than 10,000 applicants apply for its 100-plus internship spots.

N.R. Narayana Murthy, Infosys' chairman and co-founder, said the company started its internship program six years ago to show foreign students there's more to India than "cows, poverty and pollution."

"They get exposed to another side of India," Murthy said in an interview on the Infosys campus in Bangalore. "These people will become leaders in all walks of life. If we can create a positive impression on their minds at an early stage, it's good for India and for Infosys."

Eric Stuckey, 32, an MBA student at the University of Michigan, jumped at a chance to intern at Infosys as part of a research project on global outsourcing. A former software developer, he wanted to witness the growth of India's burgeoning IT industry and get experience working with Indian companies.

"India and China are coming into their own," said Stuckey, who plans to pursue a career in management consulting. "As a business person, I know that I will be working with India and China in the future, and this is a great chance to get a first exposure."

Linkon said that while his friends back home complain about menial tasks at their entry-level jobs, he's given responsibilities at Infosys that "stretch my comfort zones and force me to work in areas in which I have little experience."

"I had originally thought I'd pay my dues as soon as possible and move back to the U.S.," Linkon said. Now he plans to stay in Bangalore for at least another year. "I'm realizing now that there is too much to learn and experience before I leave Asia."

A Funny Take on Indian Tech Support

Chips and Biryani


How one U.S. tech company builds business by arming the offshorers of India.

Michael Fister has come to India not to save money but to make money. He has seen opportunity budding at Beceem Communications, a young chip design company tucked into a few floors of a building in a bustling residential area of Bangalore. He has watched it surge at Wipro (nyse: WIT - news - people ), one of India's outsourcing giants. And Fister has spotted a burst of opportunity at MindTree, an R&D and consulting firm that is building a 15-acre campus west of downtown Bangalore, a few kilometers away from streets choked with shanties.

Fister runs Cadence Design Systems, (nasdaq: CDNS - news - people ) a $1.3 billion (sales) vendor of software and systems for chip design and testing. Consumers shopping for a cell phone or a handheld video player won't encounter Cadence, but without Cadence the gadget they want might not exist. Now Cadence, in San Jose, Calif., aims to fuel the next wave of offshoring, one that takes not just the help desk but the engineering department abroad. Cadence sells its tools throughout the world. But while China is fast becoming the world's manufacturing center, India is using its expertise in software to leap into the next innovative zone: designing chips.

"We want to be part of the world as it grows and to tap the passion, intelligence and pride of people building these new markets," Fister says. Cadence got an early start in India, opening a development office in 1987, the same year it was founded. Now it employs 900 there. Revenues are still modest. Asia (excluding Japan) accounted for only 9% of Cadence's sales last year, but India's share is growing: The firm has 160 chip design clients there, up from 15 in 1998.

So far Bangalore, India's high-tech city, has been home to most of the country's chip-design companies. But another flavor of biryani, the famed rice dish of southern India, is on the rise: In February a government-industry consortium picked Hyderabad as the spot for India's first chip-assembly-and-testing facility.

Offshoring chip design promises to turbocharge business, letting companies produce more products quicker than ever before, and at low prices. Imagine it and India's tech wizards will design it, then Chinese factories will churn out the chips for it: It's just-in-time invention.

U.S. companies can leverage this system rather than fear it. Every new chip is the basis for a score of devices; every device sparks ideas for a host of software applications. "You build a foundation around semiconductors," notes Fister. "Then you can build industries around it."

Fister, 51, has seen this multiplier effect before. A lean man with a taste for racing bikes and geeky technology, he spent 17 years at Intel (nasdaq: INTC - news - people ). He helped Intel segment the Pentium into the troika of Xeon (high end), Celeron (low end) and Pentium classic, a move that drove up profits and held competitors at bay. He was an early advocate of starting a research lab for Intel in India. Intel committed itself to chip design in Bangalore in 2002; it has 2,500 workers there now, and they have made significant contributions, most notably to Intel's portfolio of mobile technologies.

To build business in India, Cadence has spent years working with government and industry. The company has become a big supporter of the fledgling India Semiconductor Association, which hosted its first conference in February. Last year Cadence trained more than 2,000 students and engineers in India to use its tools. The company offers payment schemes that let small outfits pay for its technology as their work brings in revenues. Fister has also pushed the idea of packaging Cadence's tools into "kits" with such themes as wireless networking or consumer electronics, to better fit the projects its customers are tackling. Fister delivers the goods himself, visiting even tiny companies to listen to their plans and offer ideas of how Cadence can help them grow.

On a recent February morning in Bangalore Fister arrives in a hired Mercedes at the door of two-and-a-half-year-old Beceem Communications, located in a busy residential area that's fast turning into a business zone. Beceem works on chips that provide high-speed, wireless Internet access for mobile devices.

"We're always interested in the most cutting-edge work," Fister tells Beceem's managing director Rajat Gupta, while admiring the upstart's first coup: a modem that can deliver Internet data to a laptop at 15 million bits per second even in a car moving up to 60mph. Beceem and its partners lashed together the device in under a year.

"We have about 40 people here doing chip design and another 40 doing software development," Gupta tells Fister, leading him briskly through a large room with yellow walls and green trim, filled with cubicles. Beceem, which means "wireless" in Persian, is an international hybrid. Although most of its engineers work in India, senior management and 40 engineers who specialize in radio-frequency technology are in Santa Clara. Most of its more than $30 million in venture funding has come from the U.S. (Intel and Samsung are big investors, too.) Its first customers are in Asia.

India has built up expertise in the design of analog circuits, those that massage smoothly varying signals (like the music from a speaker). Analog happens to be a Cadence strong suit. Five years ago only a few multinational tech companies could rely on engineers in a faraway land to handle chip design, but better telecommunications and automated design tools have changed that picture.

At 10:30 a.m. in Bangalore a handful of engineers are hunkered down in their cubicles, staring at circuit diagrams on their computer screens. U.S. companies prize high-walled cubicles for privacy. Here the walls are lower, encouraging engineers to lean over the partitions and brainstorm.

Gupta reaches a series of workbenches covered with electronic test equipment and picks up a printed circuit board the size of a short stack of index cards. "Here's our first modem," he says, one for mobile WiMax. WiMax is hot: At least 350 companies have signed on to the broad technology standard. Korea and India plan to roll out the technology this year. "There's not enough copper in all the world to connect everyone in India to the Internet," Gupta says. "That's why we think this technology is so promising."

Beceem develops mobile WiMax reference designs and analog-radio chip sets for customers that piece together those components and processors to build handsets, modem cards and such. Beceem engineers were working on their designs last spring when they got a call from a Korean electronics maker that wanted to show WiMax at an Asian economic conference in Korea in November. Would Beceem's chip design be ready?

Beceem said yes, and Cadence engineers flew from Noida down to Bangalore to help Beceem work through the nuances of using the design tools (and fiddle with the tools to make them solve a knotty WiMax challenge). After a string of 18-hour days Beceem finished its design in early July. A Taiwanese chip foundry made the chips. Tessolve, another U.S.-India hybrid, which set up a testing company last year, ensured that the chips worked. The demo at the conference in Korea wowed the crowd.

Now Gupta wants even smoother ways for Beceem engineers in the U.S. and India to synch up their contributions. "It would be impossible to have our whole team in one place," he declares. His reason is echoed by others across India: Development strictly in the U.S. is expensive; development strictly in India is hard to manage and to keep on schedule.

"When I was at Intel," Fister tells his Indian host, "I used to think that tool companies just sold you a package and then said, 'You're on your own.' We've cut out those yo-yos." He pledges to keep Cadence engineers working with Beceem to make the tools bridge the geographic distances.

On another day in Bangalore security guards halt Fister's car just outside gates that separate the Wipro campus, with its manicured lawns and quiet pond, from the dusty outside world of construction zones. The company started in 1945 as Western India Vegetable Products Ltd. A few decades later it had leaped into technology and outsourcing. A third of Wipro's $2.2 billion in annual revenue comes from R&D services it provides to makers of high-tech gear. Of its 52,000 employees, 1,200 work on circuit designs for more than 180 customers in 25 countries. Wipro doesn't manufacture final products (one notable exception: PCs for the Indian market). But it does everything else.

"It's like we're a hundred product companies in one," A.L. Rao, Wipro's chief operating officer, tells Fister, as lieutenants from Wipro and Cadence settle into chairs at a long polished table. Waiters glide into the room with silver trays of sodas, biscuits and hot, sweet coffee.

Vasudevan Aghoramoorthy, a Wipro vice president, displays a schematic of a product development, from concept to chip design to support for the final product. "Seventy to eighty percent of our work gets done in the middle, in the development phase," Aghoramoorthy points out. Wipro's fastest-growing area: testing everything from circuits in development to final products.

Testing is a subtle art, one that is going virtual. Engineers can create a model of how, say, a cell phone or advanced graphics processor should work and test it by simulating the systems (say, "pushing" virtual buttons) hundreds of times. But such is the complexity of these systems that even the fastest general purpose computers cannot test all the billions of possible combinations of hardware and software interactions that a cell phone or graphics chip may encounter. Put it this way: These days chips cannot keep up with their own brainpower.

Cadence's twist has been to add the elegance of inductive reasoning. Along with its specialty hardware engine, Palladium, Cadence adds mathematical techniques that prove the validity of chip designs. "I'll tell you what," Fister says, leaning on the table. "I'll let you try out the latest Palladium for a month. After you get to know how to use it, I bet you're going to realize how fantastic it is."

One drawback: The math-intensive nature of Cadence's latest tools forces engineers to relearn how to do testing. But Fister knows Indian engineers are often game to try new approaches, provided they pay off. Wipro's Rao likes Fister's overture, and a deal is set into motion.

Fister's last stop, at the end of a weeklong road trip that began in Europe, is at MindTree Consulting, a seven-year-old firm with 3,500 employees. Road fatigue is taking a toll; at lunch Fister skips an elaborate buffet of Indian delicacies in favor of a ham sandwich. The 50-minute drive to MindTree from downtown Bangalore shows India's many facets, from a smooth modern highway flyover to side streets jammed with blacksmiths, sweetshops, street vendors hawking bright flower garlands, people waiting for dusty buses and cattle.

MindTree was founded by ten people who had already had successful careers elsewhere. (Half are former Wipro executives.) MindTree wants to be an "aspirational company," Subroto Bagchi, the chief operating officer, tells Fister.

Every employee holds equity in the privately held company, which raised $24 million in funding, mostly from U.S. venture capitalists. MindTree's logo was designed by a child afflicted with cerebral palsy. ("It shows we believe there is much we can learn from everyone," Bagchi says.) The company hosts lectures by people from diverse backgrounds--dancers, astronauts and authors--aiming to "break the engineering mindset," he says.

"Ten years ago clients would just ask: 'How many C++ programmers do you have?'" Bagchi says. "Today we're getting asked to help design a concept. We're not just saving money for customers--we're creating value."

Fister gets recharged by hearing this. Like MindTree, Cadence wants to help its customers not just build products but deepen their expertise in new areas, he asserts. MindTree executives nod. In 2004 a Korean customer asked MindTree to develop a lithium-ion battery charger for cell phones, a device that required expertise in mixed-signal and analog design that MindTree lacked. Cadence helped out, Bagchi says, both by helping MindTree engineers learn to use the right design tools and by making the wares available in a pay-as-you-go program. Eight months later MindTree delivered the battery charger--and had built a new set of skills in a booming area. "We couldn't have made it without Cadence," Bagchi says.

Now, as Fister tours the MindTree labs, he suggests that Cadence's tool kits can help MindTree sharpen its skills and add to its intellectual property in radio frequency design. MindTree's executives are intrigued. The kits could speed up their development time. A month later, they decide to try out one of the Cadence kits.

As Fister sees it, the deal is another brick in the emerging Indian semiconductor economy. "It's about building a foundation," Fister says. "You don't have to reinvent everything."

- Elizabeth Corcoran, for Forbes.


H-1B Visa Debate




S. Mitra Kalita
Washington Post Staff Writer

While the country and Congress debate the future of illegal workers in America, a quieter fight involving immigration is being battled. This week, both the House and Senate heard arguments on whether to extend the H-1B visa program which has been used to lure highly-skilled workers to the United States.

A transcript follows .

S. Mitra Kalita: Hi, everyone. Thanks so much for joining me today to talk about the H-1B visa program. While I know many of you have questions about overall immigration reforms, I'm going to try to keep us focused on visas and green cards for highly skilled workers. Also, I see a lot of questions from H1-B holders themselves or people waiting for green cards. I will answer what I can but please please please seek the advice of your immigration lawyer. Finally, stay in touch with your ideas, feedback and stories at kalitam at washpost.com. Here we go...

_______________________

Rochester, N.Y.: Why do you think the Indian government is so anxious to have Congress raise the H-1B cap? They have lobbied for this through the WTO GATS Doha talks. If you read the Indian newspapers and the major offshore outsourcing firms' statements, the H-1B program is critical to increasing off shoring. In other words by increasing the H-1B cap the US is accelerating the transfer of work overseas. Why would the Senate support that?

S. Mitra Kalita: Can you please clarify? Most of the proponents of the H-1B program, such as software companies, say the program actually helps them avoid outsourcing jobs overseas. They also cite the economic effect that these H-1B visa holders have on the U.S. economy, such as buying houses, cars, clothes, lunch at the corner deli... Now some of these companies also have India operations but they say those workers help leverage the U.S. staff perform work at a higher value, increased salary, responsibility, etc.

_______________________

Middleburg, Va.: That H1-B holders lowered the wages is difficult to admit. Most are here with their spouses, whom are not allowed to work, so effectively, the household total income is much lower than others. Why then accept a lower wage? I believe the studies done are incomplete.

Esteban

S. Mitra Kalita: This is an important point - and I see a few questions on the dependents of H-1B holders, known in visa parlance as H-4s. Advocates of letting in more H-1B workers would agree with you. On the other side, though, is a point of view that they are still going to earn more than they might in, say, China or India, and that they still earn enough to live comfortably ($55,000 is one average I reported in today's story and that beats the U.S. median household income of about $45,000). Someone out there correct me on that last figure if I am way off as it's based on memory.

_______________________

Sacramento, Calif.: Do you believe that Indian firms, such as Razorlight that was cited in your article, should be allowed to hire H-1Bs even if there are qualified Americans available to fill the jobs? Might Indian firms prefer to hire from their own nationality, perhaps due to contacts back in India that would like to work in America?

S. Mitra Kalita: I should have stated in my preface that I am precluded from telling you what I believe or think on most issues. I will however say that I have been writing about H-1B issues for more than five years, and I honestly remain ambivalent and undecided about the program (a good thing, perhaps). In response to your question, I have found that many employers, who happen to be Indian, do hire people based on connections to other people, who also happen to be Indian. There have been a few cases of fraud found in relation to the H-1B program, as well.

_______________________

Ithaca, N.Y.: Thanks for taking this question! Is there a job list associated with H-1B visa? Is H-1B only limited to certain professionals?

S. Mitra Kalita: H-1Bs are limited to people in "specialty" occupations and must have at least a college degree. Here are some commonly asked questions about the program from the immigrationagency overseeing them.

http://uscis.gov/graphics/howdoi/h1b.htm

_______________________

Boston, Mass.: My comment is:

The U.S. has the capacity to stop all lawful and unlawful immigration if it wishes. It can boot out all illegals, but this is all a game of brinkmanship between the congress and those in corporate America. Guys like Pat Buchanan make a living writing books on the matter, and then go to Imus in the morning and says the most hideous things about immigrants. If they were Irish newcomers, they would be OK in Pat's eyes. Stop the H-1B Visas, those guys in India and China don't need to come here and every one will live happily ever after.

S. Mitra Kalita: A comment.

_______________________

VA: Madam Mitra Kalita,

Good afternoon!

My comments: An employer has to go through two lengthy procedures set by DOL, before actually it files H-1B application for an alien with CIS. This recruitment and labor certification process intended to protect U.S. workers interest and U.S. labor market. But number of U.S. employers wishing to hire foreign workers, every year, far more outnumbers 65,000 H-1B visa allocated by Congress. We observe the same trend for this year and have to wait to file these applications until April 1, 2006, when 2007 H-1B visas become available. There is in place some kind of protective measure for U.S. job market and the existing process, yet very long, still helps to match a US employer wanted to hire a professional and the needed, qualified foreign worker. You do not to go to far, it is very plain proof that the US needs these qualified professionals and the Congress is right intending to increase the number up to 115, 000.

Question: Do the people opposing the increase of H-1B visa, think ever about this simple fact?

S. Mitra Kalita: Another comment I am passing along. I do think the other side thinks about it. Their response to me has been that the costs for fees, lawyers and the time invested still outweigh what these companies would pay U.S. citizens or green card holders.

_______________________

Dallas, Texas: With clear evidence supporting the contention that Microsoft spent millions of dollars via their lobbyist Jack Abramoff to expand the controversial H-1B visa program in 1998 and 2000, what recourse do U.S. citizens, who were badly harmed as their careers were destroyed, have against Microsoft's corruption?

As we speak, Microsoft is "lobbying" again to increase H-1B limits. They want to eliminate any H-1B limits.

In post - Watergate Washington, DC, the soft rustle of lobbying dollars trumps any reasoned arguments for ending the H-1B visa program.

Dr. Gene A. Nelson

website: http://www.AnAmericanScam.com

S. Mitra Kalita: I do not have an answer for this but wanted others to see it. I can't vouch for the validity of your claims necessarily except to say the tech lobby has been growing in Washington.

_______________________

Fairfax, Va.: Hi Mitra...I like your column and read all the articles that you wrote about H-1B workers and their families, who came to US with a dream of good life but got stuck with one employer and might not be able make much progress.

My question to you is what is the best recourse to H-1B worker spouse and their family besides baby sitting at home and drain all the education and skills they have. They would want to work, improve their expertise and contribute to the U.S. economy as well but being dependent status on their visa wouldn't allow them to be on payroll.

S. Mitra Kalita: Another question about spouses. This scenario, immigration advocates, argue, is forcing families to look to other countries that more loosely hand out work permits. I am going to post a story I did on this last fall. Hang on.

_______________________

washingtonpost.com: Immigrant Wives' Visa Status Keeps Them Out of Workplace , Oct. 3, 2005

S. Mitra Kalita: Here is the story I just mentioned.

_______________________

Memphis, Tenn.: I am 60 years old and have been in the Information Technology field for approximately 38 years, as a computer programmer, systems analyst, IT manager, and Database Advisor for 3 major corporations. The H-1B Visa program has destroyed the marketplace for American citizens who want to pursue this type of career. My son (23 years old) graduates in May from the University of Tennessee with a major in Economics. I discouraged him from going into any type of technology field (computer science, engineering, etc.) because the jobs will not be as available to American citizens and certainly not in the pay scale that they should be. Look around. I have associates with other companies that report the same situation in their American companies. The influx of Indian and Asian technicians has basically eliminated many upper-middle-class job opportunities for American citizens to pursue through formal education. There will come a day (and soon) that this country will experience first-hand what France did during the French Revolution. The gap between the rich and poor gets wider and the middle class gets smaller. Mark my words.

S. Mitra Kalita: Posting another comment. Thank you for it and good luck to you and your son. As an aside, groups such as the one I quoted today, IEEE-USA, say they do try to encourage U.S. workers to stay globally competitive and keep getting training in the latest technologies and innovations.

_______________________

Washington, D.C.: Thank you for your informative article on a topic that needs more attention.

I'm trying to get an sense of the scope of the problem from the perspective of an H-1B visa holder. Just how long does it typically take professionals from India and China/Taiwan to get a green card through their employer these days? What disinsentives are there for employers, other than the risk that the green card may not be approved and their employee will have to return to their home country?

S. Mitra Kalita: Absent from much of this debate are the voices of H-1B holders themselves and I thank you for your question. I talked to someone who wouldn't allow himself to be quoted by name (so I did not use him in today's story) but this particular individual's story is one I hear often: He has been here for nine years, first on a student visa, then an H-1B. His employer applied for his green card in 2002 and he has been waiting four years because it is tied up in the backlog for labor certification. He said he is giving it six more months and if it doesn't come through, he's heading back to India. This stage is the one that a lot of observers agree where a worker risks being exploited. They are beholden to the employer because of the green card sponsorship (an H-1B visa can travel with a worker from one company to another, however) and cannot get promoted because that is technically a change in job classification -- and would require a new application. On the other hand, a lot of companies say that they know once someone gets a green card, they are out the door because suddenly they can start a company, go work for someone else, get promoted... Anyway, I could go on and on with background on this but instead I will post a story I did last summer on the green card backlog. Hang on.

_______________________

washingtonpost.com: For Green Card Applicants, Waiting Is the Hardest Part , July 23, 2005

S. Mitra Kalita: Here it is. Perhaps this will provide some answers on the green card process.

_______________________

Mclean, Va.: I am amazed that people are so misinformed about the job market - my company, a fortune 50 one - has had tremendous trouble filling up its vacancies - AND this is with a H-1B ban! Over and over the VP in the company fret about all the unfilled postions they have - around 250 positions !

How do you explain this disparity - the public perception that Americans are loosing jobs and the fact that a great company is having trouble filling up its positions with a H1b ban in place ? Something does not add up here ...

S. Mitra Kalita: Herein is the perspective of companies that say they desperately need the cap to be raised because they just cannot find qualified U.S. workers -- and they need the relief now in order to stay competitive or grow. Retrain, the opponents might say. Well Java and C++ might not be that easy to learn (at least for me!). Just laying out some of the arguments...

_______________________

Anonymous: As a HR Professional, I'm also conflicted about the H-1B program. I've seen it both succeed and fail. It can succeed when there is a very specific job (say a database architect) that requires an advanced degree and many years of experience in a specialized technology. However, I think more times than not it fails. I've seen too many companies hire H-1B "body shops" for basic computer jobs like QA (that may require a bachelor's degree, but truly aren't that difficult) and hold the H-1B holders hostage for a sub-market wage. I don't think Congress gets the subliety of the difference between these two situations and don't know how you could legislate it without getting into every job description in America. Your thoughts?

S. Mitra Kalita: I think you summarized a lot of the challenges I laid out in the story today. I can't offer an opinion but I can say this: if immigration is going to be overhauled, shouldn't the shortcomings of this program be dealt with? And what is the best way to lure international talent to the United States in a global economy? And if we don't need these workers, then where and how will the tech sector get them? And is it incumbent on the H-1Bs themselves to police wages and their treatment a little bit more? I pose the questions to the rest of you. Thoughts?

_______________________

Northern Virginia: Is the visa/greencard process so convoluted that one must have an immigration lawyer these days? How difficult is it for an intelligent, university-educated H-1B holder to figure out the system on his/her own? If, by definition, one would be lost without an immigration lawyer, doesn't that alone speak to the depth of the problem?

S. Mitra Kalita: I have heard numerous stories about immigration lawyers giving bad advice that resulted in delays or even deportation, from nannies to my dearest friends. On the other hand, a good lawyer can make all the difference in navigating a very complicated process. So yes, they are needed, both by the company and the employers. Some workers offer to pay the fees for them if they really want the company to give them a job but they don't have work authorization to work in the United States or are coming off of a student visa.

_______________________

Dallas, Texas: One of the reasons given for excluding poor uneducated workers from Mexico is that they take jobs away from citizens and depress wages, e.g., in construction. Why isn't this also touted as a reason for excluding highly skilled workers who certainly take jobs away from citizens and labor for less than their American counterparts.

S. Mitra Kalita: This is mentioned in today's story.

_______________________

Washington DC: Dear Mitra-

Thanks for this much needed discussion! In the discussion about illegal immigration, the fact that it is very very hard to immigrate legally (the green card backlog is a great example for that) has been lost. Do you think Congress will act on that? Backlog reduction is included in the Senate bill, but I am wondering if it will ever happen. Waiting 5-6 years on top of your labor certificate is way too long!

Thanks!

S. Mitra Kalita: To be honest, the backlog does not seem like a high priority in this immigration overhaul. Someone out there correct me if I am wrong. But that dismays a lot of people on H-1s who have been waiting for years and years for green cards as Congress talks about possibly giving amnesty to workers who migrated illegally. The H-1Bs are saying, "Hey, wait a second, what about me?"

_______________________

Burke, Va.: I am hearing and reading lot of immigration news and "to happen" regulations. What I really don't understand is why is the H-1B visa given only for an extended period of six years? If the goal of H-1B visa is hiring skilled labor to meet special skilled jobs than why can't the US government give green cards to these skilled workers based upon their academic and working skills? I know our northern neighboring country, Canada offers Green cards based upon qualifications!

As being an alien, I understand, it probably is a good thing to give a guest worker program to all the illegal in the U.S. so all can have an opportunity to do something. But what about the temporary legal (Quasi-legal) working H-1B aliens, who would like to make U.S. their home?

S. Mitra Kalita: This was expressed in today's story by Stuart Anderson, and even the folks at IEEE-USA, who were very clear to say they do support immigration but not the H-1B program. Also I spoke to (but didn't quote in today's story) a representatative of NAFSA, the group for international educators, who said he doesn't understand why the United States would want to educate so many foreign students in fields such as engineering, computer science, math and physics -- only to make this investment and then send them home. He was a big advocate of the provision in the Specter bill that would allow foreign students to immediately gain green card sponsorships from employers. And in regards to your point about Canada, I have heard from some immigrants that they are choosing to work in Canada, Australia, parts of Europe because the process of permanent residency is easier -- and their spouses can work.

_______________________

Memphis, Tenn.: Folks -

You just don't seem to get it. t's all about money. Profit ! American companies can contract 2 H1B-Visa technicians for every 1 American citizen. I know. I've seen it first-hand. Plus there's no retirement plan to worry with, no health insurance to pay for, no workman's comp issues, etc. etc. The companies that I am aware of only work through contract organizations who only hire Indian and Asian contractors. Simple facts. Don't get hung up in all of the other baloney. It's about money.

S. Mitra Kalita: Passing along the comment. Although I do feel compelled to correct that employers both on the H-1B and the H-2B (that's the low-skilled guest workers program, landscapers, busboys, cleaners, etc.) tend to pay Social Security, Medicare and income taxes. I have never met an H-1B worker without health insurance, and most of the H-2B jobs require worker's compensation because of the nature of the jobs. But thank you for the feedback.

_______________________

Washington, D.C.: I think at some point the perception that all immigrants are equal has go away - H-1B visa holders, especially ones that have a degree from the US have to be treated differently from the Mexicans - part of the reaon being that they tend to assimilate much better and becuase there can be no question that an well educated tax paying individual contributes to the community as a whole.

For the gentleman who suggest a version of the French Revolution, I would point out that its the H-1B's who get exploited more consistently , especially by the "body shops" ...

S. Mitra Kalita: Another comment. Although certainly the assimilation point is debatable, no? Some tech associations in Silicon Valley hold meetings in Mandarin!

_______________________

Alexandria, Va.: It's a shame because almost all the great advances in science, math, and computing have been and continue to be due to Europeans and Americans, despite the academic success of Asians.

But Americans will not enter a field where the wages are depressed to an unknowable degree by future immigration policy and where they are denigrated as "not world class".

Hence we will lose our lead in technology and, in fact, likely the whole world will suffer from the absence of our creativity. Not to mention the threat to our security from not having any of our intelligent nationals capable in these fields. They will all be lawyers or entrepreneurs.

S. Mitra Kalita: Another comment.

_______________________

Orange County, Calif.: Hi Mitra,

I have had a M.S. in Computer Science for over 10 years, and have seen how before and after the dot com bubble popped, that H-1B people are exploited and how US employees are exploited by companies taking advantage of a larger low cost labor pool.

First of all, the labor market is not tight. My last employer closed down the local office here, and it took me 11 months to find a new job in the same field. A friend of mine with a M.S. from Stanford took 8 months in Northern California.

In the past, and just recently during my raise review, we as a group were told to expect low 2% raises. During my private review, my manager told me the market is highly competitive with viable employees here and in other countries, and that is why the company does not feel significant raises are necessary at this time.

I know people with H-1B visas, they are very nice. It was surprising to hear how they are unhappy to be tied to a specific employer and how they know they are being undercut in their salary. They say they put up with it in hopes of becoming a US citizen, and then escaping their current employer for more greener pastures.

Business are the only ones interested in H-1B visas so they can reduce costs. I understand how they are in the business to make money, but I wish they were as honest in public as they are in private. That way everyone would understand who these people really are.

Thanks for bringing up this important topic in the WP.

S. Mitra Kalita: Another comment.

_______________________

Falls Church, Va.: Understand, some opponents are against the Congress's indented increase of H-1B visa numbers; but there is a problem, so what is their suggested solution of this issue?

S. Mitra Kalita: I have heard few solutions except for the provisions to allow foreign students in CERTAIN fields to go directly to the green card process. There was some proposal out there to increase overall green card-based immigration (I believe it is currently 140,000 annually with each country given the same number of spots) but have not heard much else. Has anyone else?

_______________________

Rochester, N.Y.: Clarification on earlier question about Indian Government stance on H-1Bs and offshoring.

You Said:

S. Mitra Kalita: Can you please clarify? Most of the proponents of the H-1B program, such as software companies, say the program actually helps them avoid outsourcing jobs overseas.

So, I'll ask once again why the Indian government and every major offshore outsourcing firm (represented most prominently by NASSCOM) has been itching for the cap to increase? The answer is pretty simple: offshore outsourcing firms such as Cognizant, Tata Consultancy, Infosys, etc. use the H-1B to bring in foreign workers to facilitate the transfer of software development to India. They don't hire US workers.

The H-1B program is used in two ways now. One as a "Brain Capture" program but also as a method to transfer work overseas.

Just read the risk sections in the financial statements given to the SEC of the major IT offshore outsourcing. Their business depends on access to H-1Bs and L-1s.

S. Mitra Kalita: Passing along the answer. One point on this: some companies that have opened up "captive" offshore development centers (that means it's their company and brand, not a third-party service provider) are hoping to leverage the talents of H-1B workers who work in their U.S. offices for a few years and then return to India or China to have them work in much-needed middle management positions. That's more of a corporate and workplace strategy though and I don't know that it relates to your comment.

_______________________

Boston, Mass.: I would like to add the perspective of an H-1B visa holder: Do Americans realize that every year we pay millions of dollars of social security and medicare taxes for programs that most of us will never benefit from? (Note: this is separate from income taxes which of course we should and do pay as we take advantage of public services here) If we do not get a green card and have to return to our home countries after 6 years of being on an H-1B (the max allowed), we have no recourse to claiming back those taxes. This is always true for Indians and Chinese workers. Europeans can claim the contributions via their own state sponsored social security plans. Where is the justice in this?

S. Mitra Kalita: Thanks for your comment.

_______________________

Albany N.Y.: Not all H-1B holders are engineers from India. They can be biomedical researchers from Europe. IMHO H-1B is essential for the development of basic research in the U.S.

Another thing. What's the reasoning behind not letting spouses work? It did not affect me since both of us were H-1Bs but I see it around as such a negative effect. Good hard working people with good academic backgrounds are prevented from entering the US economy. It doesnt make sense! Also does it have a bit of gender discrimination in it? since the majority of spouses are wives?

S. Mitra Kalita: See the story I just posted above on the spouses and gender discrimination; you also might want to look into Congress' Violence Against Women Act and its effect on immigrant spouses. And thank you thank you thank you for the reminder. I've got India and China on the mind since those are the foreigner so many reference but there are Latinos on H-1Bs, Europeans, even Canadians, so let's not forget it is a diverse group. It's just that *most* go to India and then China.

_______________________

Irvine, Calif.: The most important reform required for the H1-B program is to reform the green card processing system. The very fact that an H1-B employee cannot switch companies after starting the green card processing brings about slave labor working conditions for the employee.

The green card processing should be delinked from the employer based processing and should probably follow the permanent immigration system based in Canada. That way, an H-1B employee DOES not have to stick with the company which is processing his green card and can move to any company that is willing to employ him. This way, the wages will remain competitive as the companies now do not have that bargaining chip of green card processing.

This reform is very much required and is one of the ways the wages can be kept at a high level.

S. Mitra Kalita: A possible solution? Thank you for writing in.

_______________________

Alexandria, Va.: EVery H-1B visa debate deals with skilled workers in the IT or Engineering field. But I wanted to ask Ms. Kalita if there were H-1Bs sought for other professions that are non-technical in nature. For example, I just graduated from a U.S. Institution with a bachelor's in Journalism. Are my prospects of getting a work visa sponsored slim?

S. Mitra Kalita: I know of a few H-1B holders in journalism. However, some companies flat-out refuse to sponsor them because they have a great number of native-born Americans or green card holders applying for these jobs and don't want to go through the hassle of lawyers, fees, etc. Remember, in order to get to the stage of sponsoring an employee's green card, a company must show that it tried and could not get a U.S. worker for the job (post classified ads, show the Department of Labor who applied and why they were turned down, etc). In fields like journalism, that might be a little harder to show than tech? Just speculating here. That being said, I know of a few journalists who succeeded in getting green cards... Perhaps you can use your year of practical training (which holders of the student visa get) to find an internship or job and then take it from there...

_______________________

Anonymous: The problem with the program is that it's easily abused. I'd say 30% of H1 hires from India or China are not only poorly educated in general, but severely lacking in their specialized field as well. That's possible due to the fact that in IT 80% hiring managers or those who screen candidates are Indian or Chinese as well. Members of the diaspora have a natural advantage, besides, say, an Indian manager can hire practically anyone straight from India... Bribery is definitely a factor. So here you have it: Mexican peasants have to sneak across the border whereas Indian ones enter in a dignified manner and straight into corporate offices.

S. Mitra Kalita: Another comment. Trying to put as many out as possible as we're down to the last few minutes here...

_______________________

Anonymous: Thank you for this much needed discussion. I think one point which needs to be made is the difficulty in returning to one's own country. In total, I have spent more than 10 years in the U.S. pursuing 2 degrees, 2 OPTs, and now the H-1B. Returning to one's own native home can result in unbearable culture shock. Now many of us are stuck between waiting for a future that may never be, or returning to a country that does not seem to understand us anymore.

S. Mitra Kalita: I think this is a fair point and I am going to send out the story I just did on the culture shock Indians returning to India face... Just to show you the other side, the H-1B visa is technically considered a 'nonimmigrant' visa and most holders tell me a story of being asked at the American Embassy whether they will return home--and they always say 'yes' but knowing that's unlikely. By the same token, the Labor Department really has been tasked with making sure that no American can do the job your company says you can do... Still, I wish you luck and thank you for writing.

_______________________

washingtonpost.com: A Reversal of the Tide in India , Feb. 28, 2006

S. Mitra Kalita: Here is the story on returning to India.

_______________________

Orlando, Fla.: In regards to this comment:

I would like to add the perspective of an H-1B visa holder: Do Americans realize that every year we pay millions of dollars of social security and medicare taxes for programs that most of us will never benefit from?

Do "guestworkers" realize many Ameicans like myself have NO expection on getting any of these benefits?

But, I'll let my retired father know you are helping pay him his Social Security.

S. Mitra Kalita: Sending along the comment.

_______________________

Delhi, India: The U.S. government requires H-1B workers to pay social security, medicare, unemployment insurance. But non-immigrants like H-1Bs are clearly not entitled to receive any benefit from these programs. I worked on H-1B for 5 years and went back to India. Why doesn't the U.S. government want to refund my social security contributions? BTW -why does the U.S. government want to bring in people on restricted rights? There is no shortage of workers -given the right salary anybody will do anything. The only reason H-1B can be cheaper is if it amounts to slavery.

thanks

-kamal

S. Mitra Kalita: The other side of the SS debate.

_______________________

Washington D.C.: Re employment based green cards, this is part of the proposed senate bill:

TITLE FIVE

This title was not modified significantly during the Committee process. It includes provisions:

@nding the counting of Immediate Relatives of U.S. citizens against the annual cap on family-based immigrants; redistributing immigrant visas among the various family-based preference categories

@ncreasing the number of employment-based immigrant visas from 140,000 to 290,000 and redistributing the visas among the various employment-based preference categories (including increasing the number of visas available to "essential workers" from 10,000 to 87,000); and no longer counting spouses and children of employment-based immigrants against the visa limits

A%rmitting immigrant visa numbers that go unused because of processing delays to apply to a subsequent fiscal year

Aìightly expanding the per-country limits to help clear out backlogs from countries like Mexico, China, and India

Courtesy of shusterman.com

S. Mitra Kalita: There you go - it looks like it does increase green card-based visas... Thank you, shusterman!

_______________________

Washington, D.C.: I'm currently on an H-1B and for the record not in the tech field, not from Asia, and even female to kill all the stereotypes. Now, my salary is not that high. Sure, I'd like to get a raise, but guess what, with a visa that says that the day you lose your current job you have to leave the country, I think twice before being demanding...

S. Mitra Kalita: Another perspective.

_______________________

Washington, D.C.: Did you know that only "H-1B dependent" employers are required to try to recruit U.S. workers? Other employers can fire U.S. workers at will and replace them with H-1B's.

It is a fact that there are available U.S. workers to perform any job, if they are paid a wage that hasn't been artificially depressed by the widespread importation of foreign workers or by offshoring. If employers were required to offer U.S. workers a "prevailing" wage that took this into account, more U.S. workers would be available.

The universities actively recruit foreign F-visa students to pump up their tuition receipts. These same aliens then stay on in J visas, getting experience and training at depressed wages to the detriment of U.S. workers. When the time comes to bring in workers at the H-1B level, employers require U.S. workers to have the experience and training the employers themselves gave to the J visaholders.

S. Mitra Kalita: Sending this along. Opponents of the H-1B program say companies also get around the rules by hiring "consultants" on H-1Bs through body shops to do the work.

_______________________

Chicago, Ill.: " I have heard from some immigrants that they are choosing to work in Canada, Australia, parts of Europe because the process of permanent residency is easier -- and their spouses can work."

It is very very true - U.S. has lost a lot of ground becuase of this - being on an H-1B is like being stuck - I just returned from India where I had a chance to look at my cousins resume - - 25 years old she has experience from Japan, Australia and UK - in a quasi technical job (not programming).

S. Mitra Kalita: Just so you all know that I am right... :)

_______________________

Fairfax, Va.: I oppose increase in H1B limits. Eventhough, I came to this country on H1B visa in early 90s and now I am a Green card holder waiting to become a naturalized US Citizen.

H-1Bs visas are mostly used by staffing companies who exploit them. It took me close to 9 years to become GC holder, mostly because my ex-employer delayed the process to keep me locked at a lower salary.

The IT industry has changed now and there are abundant people to work, but very few IT jobs. American companies are outsourcing a lot of work. In addition many Indian companies are bringing hordes of people on L1 visas, which does not lead to GC and also does not have the H1B portability (to allow them to exploit them even more).

The shortage of jobs has caused lot of Americans to become angry against Indians, GC & non-GC. I was welcomed with open arms, but now we are being sneered at and asked to go back to India.

The Govt should stop immigration temporarily to allow the new legal immigrants to assimilate.

S. Mitra Kalita: From a former H-1B holder... You know what strikes me? The minute an H-1B holder gets his or her green card, they seem to forget (and likely want to forget) those days where they agonized and strategized over how to stay in the country, where in the labor cert process the application was, etc. I wonder if the H-1Bs have any lobbying groups out there for them. If so, can you please e-mail me with your contact info. Years ago, I used to quote a group called the Immigrants Support Network but I have tried to reach out and not heard about it in a long time. Any H-1B support groups out there?

_______________________

Memphis, Tenn.: One more comment and I'll let this go. You cannot tell me that if Americans were going to India and the Asian rim and taking jobs that the CITIZENS of those countries wanted and needed and also planned for their children - that the INDIANS and ASIANS would be agreeable to it. Point is : this is my country ... I am an American citizen ... my son is an American citizen ... my country is allowing job opportunites for its citizens to be given away to NON-CITIZENS, sacrificing on the altar of CORPORATE PROFIT. I DO NOT OBJECT to LEGAL IMMIGRATION. I object to my government destroying its own MIDDLE-CLASS. Like the Alexandria, VA comment - I've encouraged my son to become a lawyer or entrepreneur. Maybe he could start a CONTRACT COMPANY contracting H-1B-Visa workers to American companies in the U.S and put his son out of a job opportunity.

S. Mitra Kalita: OK letting your comment in under the wire... I am going to start wrapping up now...

_______________________

Rockville, Md.: Though H-1B visa is a Non Immigrant Visa, but one can have an immigrant intent. It's not the same as student's or visitor's visa where you have to show that you will return to the home country. I don't think the embassies ask this question for H-1B visas.

S. Mitra Kalita: Thanks for your comment.

_______________________

Clarksburg, W.V.: I've heard that the foreign workers are not allowed to go home for a visit during their six years visa, also that many live in apartments together so that they can send money home. I believe they cause a signifance disadvange for American workers be I recently read that was are not producing enought engineers out of American colleges to go around. Your thoughts please

S. Mitra Kalita: The foreign workers can go home while they are on the H-1B visa. The confusion likely comes in when they are in the renewal period (the visa can be renewed once at the three-year mark for another three years) OR when a person has been sponsored for a green card and they often don't want to risk going overseas in case they can't come back in. There is something else about needing passports stamped in the interim and all that but ask an immigration lawyer to be sure... Finally, on the point about U.S. engineers. Duke University conducted a study where they found that some of the numbers of U.S. engineering graduates versus China's and India's might not be wholly accurate. Check it out at http://memp.pratt.duke.edu/downloads/duke_outsourcing_2005.pdf

Nonetheless, the study does conclude, "Our engineering population is not stagnating, but it certainly could be growing faster."

_______________________

S. Mitra Kalita: Folks, I am so sorry but I need to wrap up now. I still have more than 100 questions in the queue and I am sorry I could not get to all of them. I appreciated both your candor and politeness in discussing this controversial issue and hope you stay in touch! If you haven't had enough of me, tune into Washington Post radio at 5:30 tonight. Thanks again for reading and responding. Best, Mitra

_______________________

Orphans of the Empire





Reviewed by Donna Rifkind
Sunday, April 2, 2006

THE INHERITANCE OF LOSS
A Novel
By Kiran Desai

Kiran Desai's second novel tackles the lingering effects of colonialism on two kinds of South Asian people: those who attempt to leave India and those who remain. Set in 1986 in Kalimpong -- a Himalayan town in India's northeastern corner -- as well as in New York, the book details the beginning stages of a love affair. Here and there it unleashes some moments of bleak comedy, but the sweet-natured playfulness that cartwheeled through Desai's first novel, Hullabaloo in the Guava Orchard (1998), is conspicuously absent. Instead, the prevailing mood is implacable bitterness and despair.

Among those who find themselves immobilized in an ever-expanding web of debilitating Western influences are Jemubhai Patel, a Cambridge-educated retired judge whose unrequited Anglophilia has condemned him to a lifetime of loneliness and self-hatred; his convent-educated 17-year-old granddaughter, Sai, whose parents were killed in the Soviet Union, where her father was training to be an astronaut, and who now lives with the judge in his grand, crumbling mountain home; Gyan, a young accountant who abandons his budding romance with Sai when he joins a group of insurgents agitating for an independent Nepali state; and Biju, the only son of the judge's ill-treated cook, who roams silently through a series of menial New York restaurant jobs.

"Perfectly first-world on top, perfectly third-world twenty-two steps below": This is Desai's succinct description of Biju's working environment, where his position in Manhattan's rat-infested basement kitchens is firmly fixed. It's a position in which the rest of her characters are metaphorically pinned as well. All of them are exiles whether at home or abroad, and all of them struggle -- and fail -- to maintain a foothold and a shred of dignity in the encroaching morass of Westernization.

What unfolds in the novel is not so much a plot as a sequence of illustrations of Desai's worldview. There are shifts backward in time to the judge's Cambridge days, when "he worked at being English with the passion of hatred." There are descriptions of the slowly mounting insurgency in Kalimpong, where angry young men demanding a homeland shout and march "as if they were being featured in a documentary of war . . . these unleashed Bruce Lee fans in their American T-shirts made-in-China-coming-in-via-Kathmandu." The narrative swerves restlessly, as if the book itself were motoring up Kalimpong's dizzying mountain roads. It veers from Sai's fledgling romance with Gyan during the monsoon season to the judge's long-ago failed marriage, from the tragicomic anxiety of the judge's elderly neighbors during the insurgency to Biju's humiliations as a bewildered illegal alien, forever at the mercy of soulless embassy bureaucrats and heartless restaurant bosses.

Desai's grim imaginings are plainly designed to disturb and challenge complacent readers and to instill a sense of dislocation similar to that of her protagonists. But the force of her enterprise is diluted when her restlessness as a storyteller spills into impatience. Just as the reader begins to engage with a character, the narrative jumps to another time and place, another set of dire circumstances, making it difficult to develop any sort of uninterrupted sympathy.

The author's impatience reveals itself also through the constant introduction of minor characters, most of whom appear all too briefly, like Biju's friend Saeed Saeed, a Zanzibar native whose unflagging determination to succeed in America is one of the book's only flashes of optimism. Interspersed throughout the book, these smaller portraits are illuminating, but too distractingly sketchy to offer the reader an emotional connection.

With The Inheritance of Loss , Desai makes clear her intention to expand her reach from the narrow boundaries of her first novel to the global arena where big-name novelists like Salman Rushdie and Zadie Smith already confidently perform. In many ways, she has succeeded. The writing has a melancholy beauty here, especially in its sensuous evocations of the natural world: "white azaleas in flower, virginal yet provocative like a good underwear trick"; "mountains where monasteries limpet to the sides of rock." Her keen appreciation of contradiction enriches the book, and, if the integrity of her narrative is less than perfect, the integrity of her ideological convictions is absolute.

Yet what's most surprising about Desai's career thus far is that her first book was, in one important way, a more sophisticated effort than its successor. A small, brilliant fable, Hullabaloo in the Guava Orchard showed off its young author's profound comprehension that every novel, large or small, is at its heart an intimate thing. Its success depends on its author's unwavering attention to a group of characters who are the reader's emotional conduit to the book's wider drama. Some of that comprehension seems to have been left behind in Desai's leap to her second, more ambitious production.

Enemies, a Love Story







IDENTITY AND VIOLENCE
The Illusion of Destiny

By Amartya Sen
Norton. 215 pp. $24.95

Nowadays the economist and Nobel laureate Amartya Sen travels the world, opinions at the ready. His subjects are rarely economic. In the main, he works "out of area," taking on a wide range of political and social issues that have little to do with the dismal science. He is serene and confident, full of good cheer, ready to see the best in everyone.

Over this discursive little book lies the shadow of Sen's formidable Harvard colleague, the political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, with his celebrated theory of the "clash of civilizations." Sen has assigned himself the role of the anti-Huntington: Sen sees Huntington's thesis of cultural conflict yielding a one-dimensional approach to human identity -- and leading to the "civilizational and religious partitioning of the world," which can only occasion greater global disorder.

ere, in contrast, is Sen celebrating the complexity of human identity: "The same person can be, without any contradiction, an American citizen, of Caribbean origin, with African ancestry, a Christian, a liberal, a woman, a vegetarian, a long-distance runner, a historian, a schoolteacher, a novelist, a feminist, a heterosexual, a believer in gay and lesbian rights, a theater lover, an environmental activist, a tennis fan, a jazz musician," etc. One's civilizational identity is not one's destiny, Sen observes, and civilizational "partitioning" -- seeing the planet culture by culture -- does not capture the messiness of the world. This Earth of ours, he says, is made more "flammable" by warring definitions of human identity, rather than an embrace of the many different facets that make us human.

Sen's faith in the multiplicity of claims on human loyalty is admirable, but it can hardly stand up to the fury of the true believers. In our combustible world today, Huntington's outlook has much greater power. His "cartography" of civilizations may have been too sharply drawn and he may have been a bit cavalier about modernity's appeal across cultural lines, but he came forth with a formidable work. Nor did he fail to see the fissures at the heart of particular societies -- hence his category of "torn countries," places like Turkey, Russia and Mexico, where the matter of loyalty and identity is fiercely contested. But Sen needs his straw man, and Huntington is pressed into the role.

Sen is a product of Western (British) education. But he sees no clear demarcation between the West and the rest (the language is Huntington's). There is nothing peculiarly Western about democracy, Sen argues. It has global roots; there were antecedents of it in India and in the Muslim world at about the same time when "Inquisitions were quite extensive in Europe, and heretics were still being burned at the stake." In his most intensely argued assertion, Sen sees the democratic inheritance as a truly universal enterprise. "The Western world has no proprietary right over democratic ideas," he writes. "While modern institutional forms of democracy are relatively new everywhere, the history of democracy in the form of public participation and reasoning is spread across the world." Western practice was not "sequestered" then, and it has not developed in some "splendid isolation."

It is the unease of Islam, of course, and the violence of some of its radical adherents that have given the question of identity its contemporary global relevance. On that issue Huntington was at his most prophetic, writing of Islam's "bloody borders" and of the "youth bulge" in Muslim societies that had unhinged and radicalized the Muslim world. He did so in the early 1990s, and then history -- 9/11 and all that followed -- provided his thesis with cruel compliance.

Sen, however, wishes to rescue Islam from this "confinement." He makes his way through Islam's history and its wide geographic sweep in order to find great Muslim practitioners of tolerance and periods of genuine enlightenment. There is Akbar, the great Mughal emperor, who "insisted in the 1590s on the need for open dialogue and free choice, and also arranged recurrent discussions involving not only mainstream Muslim and Hindu thinkers, but also Christians, Jews, Parsees, Jains, and even atheists." In the face of the anti-Semitic bigotry of today's radical Islamism, Sen offers the example of Muslim rule in Córdoba and the Iberian Peninsula -- that time of convivencia , where a Judeo-Islamic civilization in court life, letters and philosophy had a genuine flowering.

Sen works with the anecdote: His potted history is tailored for interfaith dialogues. He writes of the great Jewish philosopher Maimonides, who, when forced to emigrate from "an intolerant Europe" in the 12th century, was able to find "a tolerant refuge in the Arab world" in the court of the great Muslim ruler Saladin. But this will not do as history. Maimonides, born in 1135, did not flee "Europe" for the "Arab world": He fled his native Córdoba in Spain, which was then in the grip of religious-political terror, choking under the yoke of a Berber Muslim dynasty, the Almohads, that was to snuff out all that remained of the culture of convivencia and made the life of Spain's Jews (and of the free spirits among its Muslims) utter hell. Maimonides and his family fled the fire of the Muslim city-states in the Iberian Peninsula to Morocco and then to Jerusalem. There was darkness and terror in Morocco as well, and Jerusalem was equally inhospitable in the time of the Crusader Kingdom. Deliverance came only in Cairo -- the exception, not the rule, its social peace maintained by the enlightened Saladin.

Here, for Sen's benefit, is a passage from Maimonides's seminal Epistle to Yemen : "Our hearts are weakened, our minds are confused, and our strength wanes because of the dire misfortunes that have come upon us in the form of religious persecution in the two ends of the world, the East and the West." Maimonides's geography was Islamic: The East in the Epistle was Yemen, then a battleground between Sunni and Shiite Islam, a place where Jews were being subjected to forced conversions to Islam; the Western lands were the burning grounds of Andalusia. The Almohads' pitiless warriors were in every way the Taliban of their age, the ancestors of today's religious radicals in the world of Islam. They put to the sword the fabled world of Andalusian tolerance, and young Maimonides witnessed the shattering collapse of that culture. There had been Andalusian bliss, and Muslim rulers with Jewish courtiers and poets, and philosophers who believed in the primacy of reason, but that world was scorched.

Inspirational history can go only so far; it will not bend to Sen's good cheer.